Registered Medical Practitioners: Perception of Professional Secrecy
Keywords:
Registered Medical Practitioner, Professional Secrecy, Confidentiality, Doctor-Patient relationship, Medical EthicsAbstract
Confidentiality is the foundation of the physician-patient relationship, safeguarded by ethical and legal guidelines glob ally. This study evaluates Registered Medical Practitioners’ (RMPs) awareness and perception of professional secrecy, which is crucial for preventing legal and ethical violations. This cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted at a tertiary health care teaching hospital, which included 342 RMPs from various specialties. The participants’ knowledge was assessed using a standardized questionnaire, with responses categorized based on accuracy. The findings indicated that while RMPs were well-informed about confidentiality in cases of notifiable diseases (75.43%), their awareness dimin ished in complex situations such as disclosing patient information to employers, insurers, or in court (71.92% to 60.52% incorrect responses). RMPs showed better understanding when the patient’s guardian or hostel warden was involved (61.11%) but lacked knowledge in areas such as the disclosure of information without patient consent for non-commu nicable diseases. The study identified gaps in the legal and ethical frameworks guiding professional secrecy, highlighting the need for enhanced training in medical jurisprudence during medical education. Recommendations include manda tory medical jurisprudence training during both undergraduate and postgraduate education to address these knowledge gaps. The study underscores the importance of continuous education to ensure RMPs comply with ethical standards and legal requirements, ultimately safeguarding patient privacy and public health.
References
1. Karmakar, R. N. (Ed.). (2007). J. B. Mukherjee’s forensic medicine & toxicology (3rd ed., pp. 55–57). Kolkata: Academic Publishers.
2. Thompson, I. E. (1979). The nature of confidentiality. Journal of Medical Ethics, 5, 57–64.
3. Indian Medical Council. (2002, March 11). Code of ethics regulations, 2002 [Internet]. New Delhi: Indian Medical Council. Retrieved April 23, 2014, from http://www.mciindia.org/RulesandRegulations/CodeofMedicalEthicsRegulations2002.aspx
4. Ahmad, S. S. (1998, September 21). Supreme Court of India Mr ‘X’ vs Hospital ‘Z’ [Internet]. Retrieved April 2014, from http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/382721/
5. Central Government Act. (1860). Section 176 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. Retrieved from http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/641385/
6. Central Government Act. (1860). Section 269 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. Retrieved from http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/734195/
7. Central Government Act. (1860). Section 270 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. Retrieved from http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1164731/
8. Bajpai, V. (2010). Awareness of medical confidentiality among healthcare professionals in India: A study from Northern India. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 32(4), 308–312. Retrieved from https://www.jiafm.com
9. Sarkar, S. P., Chatterjee, A., & Mandal, A. (2007). Knowledge and practice of patient confidentiality among healthcare providers in a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal, India. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 4(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2007.003
10. Shankar, P. R., & Subba, B. (2011). Student attitudes towards confidentiality in healthcare: An Indian perspective. BMC Medical Ethics, 12(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-12-23
11. Das, G., & Banerjee, A. (2013). Medical confidentiality: Perceptions and practices among healthcare professionals in a teaching hospital in Kolkata, India. Journal of Indian Medical Association, 111(5), 315–318. Retrieved from https://www.jima.in
