Evaluation of Bottle gourd cv. Pusa Naveen under semi arid conditions of Panchmahal district of Gujarat

Authors

  • Raj Kumar SMS, 'PC, KVK (CIAH), Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahals, (ICAR-Central Institute for Arid Horticulture) Godhra-Vadodara Highway Vejalpur, Gujarat 389 340 Author
  • B S Khadda SMS, 'PC, KVK (CIAH), Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahals, (ICAR-Central Institute for Arid Horticulture) Godhra-Vadodara Highway Vejalpur, Gujarat 389 340 Author
  • J K Jadav SMS, 'PC, KVK (CIAH), Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahals, (ICAR-Central Institute for Arid Horticulture) Godhra-Vadodara Highway Vejalpur, Gujarat 389 340 Author
  • A K Rai SMS, 'PC, KVK (CIAH), Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahals, (ICAR-Central Institute for Arid Horticulture) Godhra-Vadodara Highway Vejalpur, Gujarat 389 340 Author
  • S Khajuria SMS, 'PC, KVK (CIAH), Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahals, (ICAR-Central Institute for Arid Horticulture) Godhra-Vadodara Highway Vejalpur, Gujarat 389 340 Author
  • K Lata PC, KVK (CIAH), Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahals, (ICAR-Central Institute for Arid Horticulture) Godhra-Vadodara Highway Vejalpur, Gujarat 389 340 Author

Keywords:

Front Line Demonstrations, local check, bottle gourd, technology, yield

Abstract

The present study was carried out at Krishi Vigyan Kendra-Panchmahals district of central Gujarat during 2012-13. One of the major constraints of traditional bottle gourd farming is low productivity because of non-adoption of advanced technologies. The lack of suitable HYVs (High Yielding Varieties), technical knowledge, quality irrigation water and awareness with respect to use of protection measures were found to be the major constraints in bottle gourd production. To increase the production, productivity and quality of bottle gourd, Front Line Demonstrations were conducted at various farmers' field. All the recommended practices were provided to the selected farmers. Results of the study revealed that the improved variety of Bottle Gourd cv. Pusa Naveen recorded the higher average yield (273 q/ha) as compared to local check (235 q/ha) traditionally grown by the farmers. The percentage increase in the yield over local check (padara bottle gourd) and demonstration (Pusa Naveen) 16.17 was recorded. The technological gap in terms of productivity (17.0 q/ha) were computed. The technology index values 5.86% was recorded. By adopting Bottle Gourd cv. Pusa Naveen along with improved production technologies, yield can be increased upto a great extent. This will substantially increase the income as well as the livelihood of the farming community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous, 2010. Gujarat, State Government Report pp.26. Anonymous, 2012. Indian Horticulture Detabase-2012. NHB,

Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. Dhaka, B.L., Meena B.S. and Suwalka R.L. 2010. Popularization of Improved Maize Production Technology through Frontline Demonstrations in South-eastern Rajasthan. J.Agri. Sci., 1(1): 39-42. Hiremath, S. M. and Nagaraju, M. V. 2009. Evaluation of front line demonstration trials on onion in Haveri district of Karnataka. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22(5): 1092- 1093. Hiremath, S. M., Nagaraju, M. V. and Shashidhar, K. K. 2007.

Impact of front line demonstrations on onion productivity in farmers field. Paper presented In: Nation Sem Appropriate Extn. Strat Manag Rural Resources, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, December 18-20, p. 100.

Joshi, P. K., Singh, N. P., Singh, N. N., Gerpacio, R. V. and Pingali, P. L. 2005. Maize in India: Production Systems, Constraints, and Research Priorities. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.

Kumar, A., Kumar, R., Yadav, V. P. S. and Kumar, R. 2010.

Impact Assessment of Frontline Demonstrations of Bajra in Haryana State. Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu., 10(1): 105-108.

Kumar, R., Khadda, B.S., Jadav, J.K., Rai, A. K. and Lata, K. 2014. Impact of front line demonstrations on

productivity of Okra cv. Gujarat Okra-2 in Panchmahals district of middle Gujarat. Ind. J. of Arid Hort., 8(1-2):68-70.

Ouma, J. H, De, Groote and Gethi M. 2002. Focused Participatory Rural Appraisal of farmer's perceptions of maize varieties and production constraints in the Moist Transitional Zone in Eastern Kenya. IRMA Socio-Economic Working Paper No. 02-01. Nairobi, Kenya: CIMMYT and KARI. Sabarathanam, V. E. 1988. Manuals of Field Experience

Training for ARS Scientists. Hyderabad: NAARM. Samui, S. K., Maitra, S, Roy, D. K, Mondal, A. K. and Saha, D. 2000. Evaluation on front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180-183.

Sharma, R. N. and Sharma, K. C.2004. Evaluation of Front Line Demonstration trials on oilseeds in Baran district of Rajasthan. Madhya Journal of Extension Education, 7:72-75.

Singh, D. K, Gautam, U. S. and Singh, R. K. 2007. Study on Yield Gap and Level of Demonstrated Crop Production Technology in Sagar District. Indian Res JExt. Edu., 7 (2&3):94-95.

Thamburaj, S. and Singh, N. 2001. Textbook of Vegetables,

Tuber crops and Spices Published by Directorate of Information and Publications of Agriculture ICAR, New Delhi pp 29-48.

Published

2025-03-12

How to Cite

Evaluation of Bottle gourd cv. Pusa Naveen under semi arid conditions of Panchmahal district of Gujarat . (2025). Indian Journal of Arid Horticulture, 10(1&2), 77–80. Retrieved from https://www.journals.acspublisher.com/index.php/ijah/article/view/21326