Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Production Traits Using Test-Day Random Regression Model in Holstein Friesian Crossbred Cattle

Authors

  • Komal N Patel Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Himmatnagar-383010, Gujarat, India.
  • Pragnesh M Patel Frozen Semen Station, Gujarat Livestock Development Board, Patan-384265, Gujarat, India
  • Ashish C Patel Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388001, Gujarat, India
  • Nilesh G Nayee Animal Breeding Group, National Dairy Development Board, Anand-388001, India
  • Rajesh S Joshi Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh-362001, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.21.6.06

Keywords:

Breeding value, Heritability, HF crossbred cattle, Random regression, Test-day model

Abstract

This study was aimed to estimate genetic parameters for milk production traits in Holstein Friesian (HF) crossbred cattle using test-day  random regression models. A total of 1,59,950 first-lactation test-day milk yield records of 17,135 HF crossbred cows, sired by 259 bulls,  maintained in four districts of Gujarat (Panchmahal, Sabarkantha, Surat, and Tapi) between 1997 and 2019 were obtained from the  INAPH-MIS database of NDDB, Anand. Variance components, heritability, and repeatability were estimated using the Average Information  Restricted Maximum Likelihood (AI-REML) algorithm fitted with a Legendre polynomial function of days in milk. The average values for  test-day milk yield (TDMY), fat yield (TDFY), solid-not-fat yield (TDSNFY), and protein yield (TDPY) were 9.12, 0.38, 0.80, and 0.30 kg,  respectively. Heritability was moderate (0.24 for TDMY, 0.16 for TDFY, 0.22 for TDSNFY, and 0.17 for TDPY), with repeatability estimates  higher for TDMY (0.79) than other traits. Sire evaluation using univariate BLUP revealed average EBVs of 63.17 kg for 305-d milk yield, 1.69  kg for fat yield, 4.19 kg for SNF yield, and 1.39 kg for protein yield. The findings demonstrate the suitability of random regression test-day  models for genetic evaluation and highlight their potential utility in structured breeding programmes of HF crossbred cattle in Gujarat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adsul, P.B. (2018). Sire evaluation based on first lactation monthly test day milk yield in HF x Gir halfbred. Master’s Thesis. Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidaypeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India.

Bignardi, A.B., El Faro, L., Torres Júnior, R.A.A., Cardoso, V.L., Machado, P.F., & Albuquerque, L.G.D. (2011). Random regression models using different functions to model test-day milk yield of Brazilian Holstein cows. Genetics and Molecular Research, 10(4), 3565–3575.

Chaudhari, C. (2019). Estimation of breeding value for energy corrected test day milk yield in cattle. Master’s Thesis. College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India.

Cobuci, J.A., Euclydes, R.F., Lopes, P.S., Costa, C.N., Torres, R.D.A., & Pereira, C.S. (2005). Estimation of genetic parameters for test-day milk yield in Holstein cows using a random regression model. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 28, 75–83.

Desyibelew, W., & Wondifraw, Z. (2019). Evaluation of milk composition in Zebu x HF crossbred dairy cows in different seasons and stage of lactations in Amanuel Town, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research, 10(255), 2.

Dhara, P. (2016). Effect of performance recording of animals by farmers themselves on genetic evaluation of sire of Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle. Master’s Thesis. College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India. Retrieved from https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/displaybitstream?handle=1/5810108610

Gebreyohannes, G., Koonawootrittriron, S., Elzo, M.A., & Suwanasopee, T. (2016). Estimation of genetic parameters using a random regression monthly test-day model in an Ethiopian dairy cattle population. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 50(1), 64–70.

Gorjanc, G., Bijma, P., & Hickey, J.M. (2015). Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations. Genetics Selection Evolution, 47(1), 65.

Habib, M.A., Bhuiyan, A.F.H., Amin, M.R., & Khan, M.S. (2019). Comparison of different models for estimation of standardized 300 day milk yield from 15 day test interval records of Red Chittagong cattle in Bangladesh. Asian-Australasian Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology, 4(1), 67–73.

Hassan, F., & Khan, M.S. (2013). Performance of crossbred dairy cattle at military dairy farms in Pakistan. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 23(3), 705–714.

Khunte, N., Mukherjee, K., Jain, V., & Patel, B. (2016). Field evaluation of productive performance of graded and crossbred cattle in Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 5(6), 4196–4202.

Kokate, L.S., Avtar, S., Rashia, B., Gandhi, R.S., Chakravarty, A.K., Gupta, A.K., & Sachdeva, G.K. (2013). Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting monthly test day milk yields in Karan Fries cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 83(4), 385–389.

Koonawootrittriron, S., Elzo, M.A., & Tumwasorn, S. (2002). Multibreed genetic parameters and predicted genetic values for first lactation 305-d milk yield, fat yield, and fat percentage in a Bos taurus x Bos indicus multibreed dairy population in Thailand. Thai Journal of Agricultural Science, 35(4), 339–360.

Lakshmi, B.S., Gupta, B.R., Prakash, M.G., Sudhakar, K., & Sharma, S. (2010). Genetic analysis of the production performance of Frieswal cattle. Tamil Nadu Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 6(5), 215–222.

Mrode, R.A., & Thompson, R. (2005). Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values (2nd ed.). CABI Publishing Company, Cambridge.

Sedgwick, P. (2014). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. British Medical Journal, 349, g7327.

Sharma, K.N.S., Jain, D.K., Bhatnagar, D.S., & Sharma, R.C. (1983). Estimation of milk fat, solids-not-fat and total solids production in Zebu and their Brown Swiss crosses. Animal Science, 36(3), 383–387.

Singh, A., Singh, A., Singh, M., Prakash, V., Ambhore, G.S., Sahoo, S.K., & Dash, S. (2016). Estimation of genetic parameters for first lactation monthly test-day milk yields using random regression test day model in Karan Fries cattle. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 29(6), 775–781.

Singh, S., Das, A.K., Chakraborty, D., Taggar, R.K., Kumar, N., Gupta, P., & Mahajan, V. (2014). Studies on genetic and non-genetic factors affecting performance traits of Frieswal cows. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 48(6), 537–540.

Swalve, H.H. (1995). The effect of test day models on the estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy yield traits. Journal of Dairy Science, 78(4), 929–938.

Verma, R., Yadav, A.S., & Dhaka, S.S. (2016). Genetic studies on production and production efficiency traits in Hardhenu crossbred cattle. Haryana Veterinary Journal, 55, 166–169.

Published

2025-11-07

How to Cite

N Patel, K., M Patel, P., C Patel, A., G Nayee, N., & S Joshi, R. (2025). Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Production Traits Using Test-Day Random Regression Model in Holstein Friesian Crossbred Cattle . Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 21(6), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.21.6.06