Studies on Echocardiographic Assessment of Healthy Non Descript Dogs

Authors

  • Rajan J Kunjadiya Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Navsari-396450, Gujarat, India
  • Manish D Patel Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Navsari-396450, Gujarat, India
  • Saurabh M Parmar Department of Veterinary Clinical Complex, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Navsari-396450, Gujarat, India
  • Sudhir A Mehta Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Navsari-396450, Gujarat, India
  • Jignesh A. Vala Department of Veterinary Clinical Complex, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Navsari-396450, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.21.3.23

Keywords:

2-D and M-mode echocardiography, Non-descript dogs

Abstract

Considering echocardiography as the most widely accepted non-invasive diagnostic tool for assessing cardiac anatomy and function  in small animals, present study was planned to assess echocardiographic parameters in dogs. Total 18 clinically healthy non-descript  dogs were subjected to 2-D and M-mode echocardiographic examinations. Dogs were categorized by gender, age and body weight to  assess their effects on various echocardiographic parameters. The mean LA, Ao, and LA/Ao ratio values were 1.70±0.04 cm, 1.72±0.05  cm, and 1.00±0.03, respectively, with non-significant group differences. However, the mean LA/Ao ratio was higher in dogs weighing  >20 kg (1.04±0.03) compared to those <20 kg (0.91±0.04). M-mode echocardiographic parameters were within normal limits. Gender  and body weight differences were non-significant, but age-related differences were observed. Dogs >3 years had significantly higher  mean values of EF (69.05±3.84%), FS (38.34±3.31%), and CO (1991.34±201.95 mL/min) compared to those <3 years (51.92±6.11%,  25.97±3.65%, and 1330.71±213.40 mL/min, respectively). Other M-mode parameters varied non-significantly across age groups. The  study concludes that the variation in certain echocardiographic parameters should be taken into consideration while evaluation of  cardiac diseases in non-descript dogs. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhargavi, S., Kannan, T.A., Ramesh, G., Sumathi, D., Prasad, A.A., & Gnanadevi, R. (2018). Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters in indigenous dog breed (Rajapalayam) of Tamil Nadu. EC Clinical & Experimental Anatomy, 1(3), 94-101.

Bhargavi, S., Kannan, T.A., Ramesh, G., Sumathi, D., & Prasad, A.A. (2019). M-mode echocardiographic studies in indigenous dog breeds of Tamil Nadu. Journal of Animal Research, 9(2), 247-252

Bodh, D., Hoque, M., & Saxena, A.C. (2019). Echocardiographic study of healthy Indian Spitz dogs with normal reference ranges for the breed. Veterinary World, 12(6), 740–747.

Boon, J., Wingfield, W.E., & Miller, C.W. (1983). Echocardiographic indices in the normal dog. Veterinary Radiology, 24(5), 214-221. Boon, J.A. (2011). Veterinary Echocardiography. 2nd edn., Wiley Blackwell. Ames, Iowa, USA, p. 667.

De Madron, E. (2016). Normal echocardiographic values: TM, 2D, and Doppler spectral modes. In: E. de Madron, V. Chetboul, & C. Bussadori (Eds.), Clinical Echocardiography of the Dog and Cat. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, p. 31.

Ettinger, S.J., & Suter, P.F. (1970). Acquired valvular and endocardial heart disease. In: Canine Cardiology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, pp: 324-325.

Gugjoo, M.B., Hoque, M., Saxena, A.C., Zama, M.S., & Dey, S. (2014). Reference values of M-mode echocardiographic parameters and indices in conscious Labrador Retriever dogs. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 15(4), 341-346.

Hoque, M., Bashir, M., & Bodh, D. (2019). Cardiac diseases in dogs. Indian Journal of Animal Health, 58(1), 1-20.

Jacobs, G., & Knight, D.H. (1985). M-mode echocardiographic measurements in non-anesthetized healthy cats: Effects of body weight, heart rate, and other variables. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 46(8), 1705-1711.

Jeyaraja, K., Yamini, S.H., & Chandrasekaran, D. (2019). A retrospective analysis of dilated cardiomyopathy in Labrador Retrievers. Journal of Animal Research, 9(5), 707-714.

Kosić, L.S., Trailović, D.R., & Krstić, N. (2017). Age-dependent electrocardiographic and echocardiographic changes in German Shepherd dogs. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 18(1), 43-48.

Locatelli, C., Santini, A., Bonometti, G.A., Palermo, V., Scarpa, P., Sala, E., & Brambilla, P.G. (2011). Echocardiographic values in clinically

healthy adult dogue de Bordeaux dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 52(5), 246-253.

Lombard, C.W. (1984). Normal values of the canine M-mode echocardiogram. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 45(10), 2015-2018.

Muzzi, R.A., Muzzi, L.A., de Araújo, R.B., & Cherem, M. (2006). Echocardiographic indices in normal German shepherd dogs. Journal of Veterinary Science, 7(2), 193-198.

Noviana, D., Paramitha, D., & Wulansari, R. (2011). Motion mode and two dimensional echocardiographic measurements of cardiac dimensions of Indonesian Mongrel dogs. Hayati Journal of Biosciences, 18(1), 1-5.

Nyland, T.G., & Mattoon, J.S. (2002). Small Animal Diagnostic Ultrasound. 2nd edn., W.B. Saunders. Philadelphia. USA, pp: 372-373.

O’leary, C.A., Mackay, B.M., Taplin, R.H., & Atwell, R.B. (2003). Echocardiographic parameters in 14 healthy English bull terriers. Australian Veterinary Journal, 81(9), 535-542.

Sagar, R., Narayana, M., Ansar, C., Kshama, M., Sahadev, A., Suguna, R., & Basava, R.K. (2020). Occurrence of canine cardiac diseases in Bangalore. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 8(6), 824-829.

Saini, N., Uppal, S.K., & Randhawa, C.S. (2017). Echocardiographic parameters and indices in healthy Labrador retriever dogs. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 72(4), 28-32.

Singh, P. (2011). Echocradiography and Doppler studies of canine heart in health and disease. Doctoral Dissertation. Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India, p: 122.

Singh, P.R. (2017). Echocardiographic studies in healthy Mongrel dogs. Doctoral Dissertation. Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go Anusandhan Sansthan, Mathura, UP, India, p: 99.

Snedecor, G.W., & Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Snyder, P.S., Sato, T., & Atkins, C.E. (1995). A comparison of echocardiographic indices of the non-racing, healthy Greyhound to reference values from other breeds. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 36(5), 387-392.

Thomas, W.P., Gaber, C.E., Jacobs, G.J., Kaplan, P.M., Lombard, C.W., Vet, M., & Moses, B.L. (1993). Recommendations for standards in transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in the dog and cat. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 7(4), 247-252.

Wiegel, P.S., Nolte, I., Mach, R., Freise, F., & Bach, J.P. (2022). Reference ranges for standard-echocardiography in pugs and impact of clinical severity of Brachycephalic Obstructive Airway Syndrome (BOAS) on echocardiographic parameters. BMC Veterinary Research, 18(1), 1-13.

Published

2025-05-07