Storage Potential and Chemical Composition of Wet Distillers Grains with Solubles (WDGS) Treated with Different Additives

Authors

  • Patakamuri Kavitha Department of Animal Nutrition, NTR College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Gannavaram-521 102, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Arunachalam Ravi Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati-517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Duddu Srinivasa Rao Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati-517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Yeddula Ravindra Reddy Associate Dean, College of Dairy Technology, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati-517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Kondeti Padmaja Department of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati-517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Radha Krishna Chaitanya Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati-517502, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.21.3.17

Keywords:

Additives, Chemical composition, Keeping quality, WDGS

Abstract

To study the keeping quality of Wet Distillers Grains with Solubles (WDGS) during 12 days of the storage period, WDGS was treated with  salt, citric acid, lactic acid, propionic acid and sulfuric acid at 1% of DM. No surface spoilage was observed up to 6 days in any of the  treatments and up to 12 days in propionic and sulfuric acid treated WDGS. Mean pH was significantly lower (p<0.01) in 1% sulfuric acid  treated WDGS. Mean NH3-N (mg/100g) concentration increased (p<0.01) from 0 day to 6th day and then decreased towards 12th day  of storage among treatments with higher mean value in 1% sulfuric acid (100.32) and lower value in 1% propionic acid (67.26) treated  WDGS. Yeast count increased towards 12th day of storage in all the treatments with higher counts in 1% salt treated WDGS. From 0 day  to 12th day of storage, mean CP values were decreased significantly (p<0.01) with higher (p<0.01) mean CP value of 37.18% in propionic  acid treated WDGS. Based on the overall results, it was concluded that WDGS can be stored up to 6 days without any additive, further  with 1% propionic acid (DMB) treatment it can be stored up to 12 days in good quality.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

Allen, W.R., Stevenson, K.R., & Buchanan-Smith, J.G. (1975). Influence of additives on short-term preservation of wet brewers’ grains stored in uncovered piles. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 556, 609-618.

Alvarez. E., Cardoso, M., Bartosik, R., Depetris, G., Castellari, C., & Montiel, M.D. (2016). A preliminary comparative study of conventional and hermetic storage of wet distillers grains with soluble, pp. 324-328. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products (CAF2016), CAF Permanent Committee Secretariat, Winninpeg, Canada.

Balamurugan, R., Valli, C., & Balakrishnan, V. (2018). Improving shelf life and nutritive value of wet distillers grain. Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research, 47(1), 1236-1243.

Buckner, C.D., Wilken, M.F., Benton, J.R., Vanness, S.J., Bremer, V.R., Klopfenstein, T.J., Kononoff, P.J., & Erickson, G.E. (2011). Nutrient variability for distillers grains plus solubles and dry matter determination of ethanol by-products. The Professional Animal Scientist, 27(1), 57-64.

(2010). Evaluation of storage of covers when wet distillers byproducts are mixed and stored with for ages. Nebraska Beef Report, MP-93, 24-28.

Elzbieta, W., Krzysztof, K., & Magdalena, K. (2005). Microbiological quality of Animal Feeding stuffs in Poland. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, 49, 315-318.

Eslamian, E., Naserian, A.A., Tahmasbi, A. M., Valizadeh, R., & Kazemi, M. (2013). Nutritional evaluation of ensiled brewers’ grain by the in vitro and in situ techniques. International Journal of Biotechnology and Food Science, 1(5), 84-89.

FAO (2022). World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2022, Rome.

Hatungimana, E., & Erickson, P.S. (2019). Effects of storage of wet brewers’ grains treated with salt or a commercially available preservative on the prevention of spoilage, in vitro and in situ dry matter digestibility, and intestinal protein digestibility. Applied Animal Science, 35(5), 464-475.

Kazemi, M., Tahmasbi, A.M., Valizadeh, R., Naserian, A. A., Haghayegh, G.H., & Esmaeil J.Y. (2014). Studies on the effects of different chemical additives on the nutritive value of ensiled barley distillers’ grain (BDG) using in-vitro techniques. Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 2(2), 19-24.

Kitaw, G., Faji, M., & Terefe, G. (2022). Nutritional and fungal load dynamics of fresh brewers’ grain stored under aerobic conditions. AMB Express, 12(10), 2-7.

Klopfenstein, T.J., Erickson, G.E., & Bremer, V.R. (2008). Board-invited review: Use of distillers by-products in the beef cattle feeding industry. Journal of Animal Science, 86, 1223-1231.

McClurkin, J.D., & Ileleji, K.E. (2015). The effect of storage temperature and percentage of condensed distillers solubles on the shelf life of distillers wet grains stored aerobically. Journal of Stored Products Research, 62, 58-64.

Moriel, P., Artioli, L.F.A., Poore, M.H., & Ferraretto, L.F. (2015). Dry matter loss and nutritional composition of wet brewers’ grains ensiled with or without covering and with or without soybean

hulls and propionic acid. The Professional Animal Scientist, 31(6), 559-567.

Mussatto, S.I., Dragone, G., & Roberto, I.C. (2006). Brewers’ spent grain: generation, characteristics and potential applications. Journal of Cereal Science, 43(1), 1-14.

Santos, M.B., Nader, G.A., Robinson, P. H., Kiran, D., Krishnamoorthy, U., & Gomes, M.J. (2010). Impact of simulated field drying on in-vitro gas production and voluntary dry matter intake of rice straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 159, 96-104.

Sastry, V.R.B., Karma, D.N., & Pathak, N.N. (1999). Laboratory manual of Animal Nutrition. Division of Animal Nutrition, IVRI, Izatnagar, UP, India, p. 48.

Simas, M.M.S., Botura, M. B., Correa, B., Sabino, M., Mallmann, C.A., Bitencourt, T.C.B.S.C., & Batatinha, M.J.M. (2007). Determination of fungal microbiota and mycotoxins in brewers’ grain used in dairy cattle feeding in the State of Bahia, Brazil. Food Control, 18, 404-408.

Snedecor, G.W., & Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th edn., Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, Calcutta, India. Zentek, J., Knorr, F., & Mader, A. (2014). Reducing waste in fresh produce processing and households through use of waste as animal feed. In; Global Safety of Fresh Produce. A Handbook of Best Practice, Innovative Commercial Solutions and Case Studies. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, pp. 140-152.

Published

2025-05-07