Evaluation of Disc Diffusion Assay for Antifungal  Susceptibility of Microsporum canis Strains of Animal Origin  from India

Authors

  • Sudhir Kumar Prajapati Division of Bacteriology and Mycology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly-243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Sonu Sukumaran Nair Division of Bacteriology and Mycology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly-243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Athira Vijaykumar Division of Bacteriology and Mycology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly-243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Bablu Kumar Division of Biological Products, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly -243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Prasad Thomas Division of Bacteriology and Mycology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly-243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Premanshu Dandapat Division of Bacteriology and Mycology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly-243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Abhishek Division of Bacteriology and Mycology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly-243122, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.21.3.25

Keywords:

Animal, Antifungal agents, Disc diffusion, Microsporum canis

Abstract

 

Dermatophytes are keratinophilic fungi that cause skin infections in both humans and animals. In the current study, 72 Microsporum canis isolates were tested for antifungal susceptibility to seven commercially available antifungal discs (HiMedia), which included clotrimazole  (10 μg), amphotericin B (20 μg), nystatin (50 µg), miconazole (30 μg), itaconazole (30 μg), ketoconazole (30 μg), and fluconazole (10 μg).  The disc diffusion method was used to assess the antifungal susceptibility of animal dermatophyte isolates. Among all tested isolates  fluconazole showed the lowest zone of inhibition, and miconazole as well as clotrimazole were having the highest mean zone of  inhibition in M. canis isolates.  Although the disc diffusion assays are not frequently used, they will give initial insights into the effective  antifungal drugs prior to starting treatment. Antifungal sensitivity testing should be the basis of treatment since dermatophytes are  increasingly showing signs of drug resistance to antifungal drugs. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agarwal, R.K., Gupta, S., Mittal, G., Khan, F., Roy, S., & Agarwal, A. (2015). Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes by agar-based disk diffusion method. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 4(3), 430-436.

Begum, J., & Kumar, R. (2021). Prevalence of dermatophytosis in animals and antifungal susceptibility testing of isolated Trichophyton and Microsporum species. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53, 1-8.

De Hoog, G.S., Dukik, K., Monod, M., Packeu, A., Stubbe, D., Hendrickx, M., & Gräser, Y. (2017). Toward a novel multilocus phylogenetic taxonomy for the dermatophytes. Mycopathologia, 182, 5-31.

Esteban, A., Abarca, M.L., & Cabañes, F. J. (2005). Comparison of disk diffusion method and broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes. Medical Mycology, 43(1), 61-66.

Fernandez-Torres, B., Cabanes, F.J., Carrillo-Munoz, A.J., Esteban, A., Inza, I., Abarca, L., & Guarro, J. (2002). Collaborative evaluation of optimal antifungal susceptibility testing conditions for dermatophytes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40(11), 3999-

4003.

Galuppi, R., Gambarara, A., Bonoli, C., Ostanello, F., & Tampieri, M.P. (2010). Antimycotic effectiveness against dermatophytes: comparison of two in vitro tests. Veterinary Research Communications, 34, 57-61.

Gnat, S., Łagowski, D., & Nowakiewicz, A. (2020). Major challenges and perspectives in the diagnostics and treatment of dermatophyte infections. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 129(2), 212-232.

Gupta, A.K., & Cooper, E.A. (2008). Dermatophytosis (Tinea) and other superficial fungal infections. In: Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Mycoses. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 355-381.

Hsiao, Y.H., Chen, C., Han, H.S., & Kano, R. (2018). The first report of terbinafine resistance Microsporum canis from a cat. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 80(6), 898-900.

Hubka, V., Peano, A., Cmokova, A., & Guillot, J. (2018). Common and emerging dermatophytoses in animals: well-known and new threats. Emerging and Epizootic Fungal Infections in Animals, 1st Edition, Pp: 31-79.

Khadka, S., Sherchand, J.B., Pokhrel, B.M., Dhital, S., Manjhi, R., & Rijal, B. (2017). Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes by agar based disk diffusion assay in Tertiary Care Hospital, Nepal. Microbiology Research Journal International, 19(2), 1-5.

Nweze, E.I., Mukherjee, P.K., & Ghannoum, M.A. (2010). Agar based disk diffusion assay for susceptibility testing of dermatophytes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 48(10), 3750- 3752.

Pasquetti, M., Min, A.R.M., Scacchetti, S., Dogliero, A., & Peano, A. (2017). Infection by Microsporum canis in paediatric patients: A veterinary perspective. Veterinary Sciences, 4(3), 46.

Ramaraj, V., Vijayaraman, R.S., Rangarajan, S., & Kindo, A.J. (2016). Incidence and prevalence of dermatophytosis in and around Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. International Journal of Research in Medical Science, 4(3), 695-700.

Salehi, Z., Shams-Ghahfarokhi, M., & Razzaghi-Abyaneh, M. (2018). Antifungal drug susceptibility profile of clinically important dermatophytes and determination of point mutations in terbinafine-resistant isolates. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 37, 1841-1846.

Singh, J., Zaman, M., & Gupta, A.K. (2007). Evaluation of microdilution and disk diffusion methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes. Medical Mycology, 45(7), 595-602.

Yamada, T., Makimura, K., Hisajima, T., Ito, M., Umeda, Y., & Abe, S. (2008). Genetic transformation of the dermatophyte, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, based on the use of G418 resistance as a dominant selectable marker. Journal of Dermatological Science, 49(1), 53-61.

Published

2025-05-10